Do you believe it is better for students to get results before their university study?

Do you believe it is better for students to get results before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, simpler to write, much easier to read.

PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, at work skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as likely to find employment…..

Better preparation, opportunity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students can change their advanced schooling course while at uni….

Many individuals genuinely believe that it is more straightforward to learn something in a group in the place of individually. Would you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has many advantages
Elements of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not dependant on others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Many people think that children must do organised activities inside their time that is free while believe that children should always be free to do what they need to accomplish in their free time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your head wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it could be unfair to this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to get
-furthermore research has revealed that the mind operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Many individuals say that globalisation therefore the growing number of multinational companies have a effect that is negative environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your answer. As to the extent can you agree or disagree Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your position.

-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop regarding the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…

Scientists genuinely believe that so that you can protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy inside their lives that are daily. However, a lot of people have not changed the way they live. Why do you think lots of people have never taken action that is individual? What could possibly be done to encourage them to do something?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of the commons
– Collective problem – better to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What could possibly be done to encourage them to do something?
– Media campaigns by the government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……

Some believe that may be the responsibility of men and women to take care of the environmental surroundings. Others say it is the government which should be careful of this environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should take care of the environment because:
We are the consumers, we vote with this wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – consumers are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should take care of environmental surroundings because:
They usually have the charged capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
allowed to be guardians associated with country, which means collectively they have been guardians associated with the earth… not true in fact

Both should be doing more!

In a lot of countries small shops and town centers are going away from business, because individuals have a tendency to drive into the large stores that are out-of-town. This results in an increase in car use, and in addition it means that people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores. Do you consider advantages of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *